SUMMIT Foundation

6530 15th Avenue North East

Seattle, Washington 98115

(206) 525-3097

September 25, 1998

Tina Podlodowski, Chair, Public Safety, Health & Technology Committee

City of Seattle

600 4th Avenue

Seattle, Washington 98104

Dear Ms. Podlodowski,

Thank you for your recent letter, dated September 8. Your letter indicates that you're interested in ongoing dialog regarding the Seattle Fire Department. As such, this letter is intended to keep this door open.

Considering the recent budget proposal submitted by Chief Sewell, you might imagine that we're very concerned about the future of the department. Although the proposal appears to indicate that the city will benefit from the decommissioning of a couple of engines, to be replaced by aid cars, reality dictates that we are selling the farm. Over the years, we've allowed the closure of a number of stations and the decommissioning of numerous engines. Now, we've reached a point where we lack adequate emergency response coverage and we're considering the closure of additional resources. Regardless of the point of view, what we're really discussing is an increase in response times for fire events.

As you review the budget proposal, you would do well to consider that many of the numbers used to calculate response times and, by extension, resource deployment, are grossly inaccurate. Although it's not widely discussed, the reality is that the times for responses are calculated on the time of the first arriving unit on the scene of an event - not at the time they reach the consumer. As such, it appears that most rigs begin rendering aid within a time frame which skirts the fringes of acceptable response times. Rather, the responses fall far outside the window of acceptability. Further, it is amazing to hear the number of times that the Fire Alarm Center reports that the city is out of medic units.

We recognize that the city feels a need to limit spending, but it appears that the citizens have been paying for adequate fire and life safety protection for many years while the funds have been used for non-emergent purposes. Let's face facts: When the situation gets tough, we expect these men and women to show up and rescue us. Without adequate resources in place, they're not going to be able to meet our demand.

SUMMIT is considering taking drastic actions to stop this madness. I thought it appropriate to discuss our plans with you, in the hope that we might gain your support in our endeavor.

Next February, when the polls open, we'd like to have a referendum or charter amendment on the ballot which would provide for better care of the fire department and the city, as follows.

1. The creation of a Board of Commissioners who would oversee the general operations of the Seattle Fire Department. Comprised of representatives from the various neighborhoods throughout Seattle, these individuals would help establish fire department policies and facilitate their various needs.

Building the Finest Fire Service in the World - Right in Our Own Back Yard


2. Establishing minimum staffing for the department at some predetermined level. The current numbers being discussed internally are between 225 and 250 members.

3. Establishing a base funding level, commensurate with staffing and equipment needs.

4. Establishing a standardized method for increasing staffing and funding as a direct correlation to the number of calls which the department services.

5. Reestablishing a number of apparatus and stations which have been closed over the years, as well as the opening of new station in poor-coverage areas of the city.

6. Establishing a better pension system for fire fighters. We are appalled and disgusted by the treatment of some members who have been injured on the job - to the extent that they are fully disabled - while the community overlooks their sacrifice.

Although these are rough ideas at this point, we're mobilizing a task force to consider language and investigate the processes for making such an event take place. As you might imagine, this isn't something we do every day. As such, we recognize that our work is definitely cut out for us. Rather than relying solely on our own fortitude, we believe that our best solution is to bring aboard a professional in managing such a campaign.

As stated earlier, we'd like to enlist your support in this effort and, in the event you are unable or unwilling to do so, we'd hope that you'll keep the door open to us.

Once again, thank you for your time in this matter. I'm looking forward to your response.

Bob Nelson, Executive Chair

SUMMIT Foundation